charleyfarley 8:08 Fri Feb 26
Salmond v Sturgeon
|
|
Seems fishy to me anybody know whats going with these two giant sweaties?
|
|
|
Replies - In Chronological Order ( Show Newest Messages First)
Hermit Road
8:16 Fri Feb 26
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
She’s running the state like the Soviet republic that hopes it one day becomes. Has all the checks and balances in her pocket therefore ensuring there are no checks and balances.
|
Alfs
8:19 Fri Feb 26
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
Ex lovers in an acrimonious spat.
|
BBondsBootlaces
8:35 Fri Feb 26
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
He's swimming up stream on this one.
|
Mike Oxsaw
8:41 Fri Feb 26
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
I suspect that favours were exchanged and deliverables reneged on.
|
Cheezey Bell-End
9:08 Fri Feb 26
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
We are due another fishy puns thread and I guess this will spawn one.
|
ak37
9:10 Fri Feb 26
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
I bet her minge reeks of fish
|
Sir Alf
9:34 Fri Feb 26
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
I know you should not "judge a book by its cover" but her husband looks a bit odd? Marriage of convenience? He look like that airline steward character from the Catherine Tate show? "Who me dear?" "How very dare you".
Her daily party political broadcast via the COVID briefings on the Beeb make the upcoming election questionable? Hardly a level playing field and one for the elctoral commission to look at?
|
Eerie Descent
9:37 Fri Feb 26
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
Marriage of convenience?
What sort of bloke do you expect the Jimmy Krankie looking bruiser to be with?
|
geoffpikey
9:44 Fri Feb 26
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
Leave it to the SCALES of justice, even if the law is a BASS.
COD only knows.
I'm FLOUNDERing but not TRAWLING any further.
|
Iron Duke
10:57 Fri Feb 26
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
He’s been done up like a KIPPER.
|
lab
11:11 Fri Feb 26
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
One of them will get knocked off their PERCH.
|
Crassus
11:18 Fri Feb 26
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
Rumours allegedly suggest she swims on the wrong side of the tank
Oh and had him fitted up for a gropery charge, the 'groped' being her political mates.
All to retain power, something of a carve up with the web of conspirators including those within the Scotcher judiciary who have collectively gone to the point of wanting him banged up
Going to get a tad messy
|
normannomates
8:15 Sat Feb 27
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
Didn't take the Jocks long to start eating themselves eh?
Pathetic really
|
normannomates
8:40 Sat Feb 27
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
Stubborn fuckers.. . If the rally call is still 'FREEDOM'.. 🙄. then they are fooked.
|
Darby_
8:53 Sat Feb 27
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
Scotland is an interesting situation. The world is slowly weaning itself off oil, and in the long term the price of oil will decline. How on earth would Scotland keep itself its economy going with ever declining oil prices?*
The Scots aren't stupid or self-destructive. They declined the chance to declare independence even when oil prices were high.
*Some economists are predicting a "commodity supercycle" which might be a last hurrah for oil prices before everyone transitions to electric cars. That might be the last chance for a successful referendum.
|
BRANDED
9:31 Sat Feb 27
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
Fucking sweaties always carping on about fishy goings on. Grouper absolute cunts.
|
Mike Oxsaw
9:37 Sat Feb 27
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
I would have thought Scotland the ideal place in the UK to build hydro-electric plants. They don't need to be massive "Hoover Dam" structures - just viable enough to power a few local communities each.
With modern technology, they could even soak up nuclear base load power when demand is low by pumping water back up into the reservoir to be re-used the next day.
|
BRANDED
9:57 Sat Feb 27
Re: Salmond v Sturgeon
|
Maybe they’ll mullet over?
|
| 
